Four Kinds of Evidence
For each Discipline/Denial
Incident (e.g. failure to hire or rent, termination or eviction,
denied benefits) alleged in the complaint, the Investigator must
collect four kinds of evidence:
- Comparative
- Direct
- A statement, verbal or written, made by the decision maker
or incident doer which indicates, directly or indirectly, a basis
prejudice or bias.
- Pattern
- How other people who share complainant's basis have been
treated by the decision maker or incident doer. In other words,
has the incident doer discriminated against other basis persons?
- Statistics
- In a "failure to hire" case, ICRC investigators
compare the basis representation percentage in respondent company's
workforce with the basis percentage in the relevant labor market.
For example, if complainant is alleging sex discrimination and
complainant is female, then the investigator would compare the
percentage of females in respondent's workforce with the percentage
of females in the area labor pool.
- In a "termination" case, the investigator would
compare the percentage of basis persons in the incident doer's
work unit with the percentage of basis persons terminated by
the doer. For example, if complainant is alleging sex discrimination
and complainant is female, then the investigator would compare
the percentage of people who are female who have worked for the
doer with the percentage of people who have been terminated by
the doer who are female.
For each Special
Incident alleged in the complaint, the Investigator must
collect sufficient information to resolve the special issues.