COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT



Under Iowa Code Chapter 216




CP#
Investigator:
Date Investigation Completed:
Recommendation:


What is the incident?
termination

What is the date of incident?

Was the incident timely filed?

What is the alleged basis?

Who is the Incident Doer (the person who made the incident decision)?

What are the Incident Doer's reasons for the incident?

Did Complainant do what the Incident Doer says Complainant did?

If not, did the Incident Doer reasonably believe that Complainant did what Doer thought he/she did?

What was the effect of Complainant's act on Respondent's business?

Who has committed an act "similar-in-kind" or "similar-in-effect" to Complainant's act while under the Incident Doer's supervision?

Did any of those "similarly situated" persons escape the incident?

Are any of those "escapees" basis persons?

Has the Incident Doer adequately explained why the younger persons escaped and Complainant did not?

Is there direct evidence of basis motive? Are there basis-related statements/remarks made by the Incident Doer? Is there a smoking gun?

Has Respondent violated the antidiscrimination statute before, as determined by a court or this agency? Was the Incident Doer involved? If so, explain.

Has the Incident Doer discriminated against other persons of Complainant's basis or against Complainant previously? If so, explain.

Do snapshot or timeframe work force statistics indicate that Respondent was basis underrepresented?

Based on the "binomial" (statistical significance test), could the underrepresentation have occurred by chance?

Was the Incident Doer at least partially responsible for the development of Respondent's work force?

Throughout Incident Doer's tenure at Respondent, how many persons has the Doer [disciplined]? What percentage of those persons are basis?

Throughout Incident Doer's tenure at Respondent, how many persons has Doer supervised? What percentage of those persons are basis?

Is the Incident Doer's basis [discipline] percentage greater than his basis supervised percentage? If so, then based on the binomial, could the Doer's basis [discipline] record have occurred by chance?

Was the basis a "motivating" factor in the incident?

What is the recommendation?

Main