CELESTE HALL, Complainant,
VS.
RICHARD P. GERDNER, Respondent.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The parties stipulated to
the following procedural facts: [starred *; see Joint Exhibit
1]
*1. The Complainant, Celeste
A. Hall, filed a verified complaint with the Iowa Civil Rights
Commission ("Commission") on October 14, 1985, alleging
a violation of Iowa Code Chapter 601A in the refusal to rent housing
to her on the basis of race, which filing was within the statute
of limitations.
*2. Said complaint was served on Respondent on November 1, 1985.
*3. The investigation was
completed on February 27, 1986. The investigator recommended a
finding of probable cause on Complainant's allegation of racial
discrimination in housing.
*4. Hearing officer Leo
Kam determined probable cause existed to credit Complainant's
allegation of racial discrimination on March 24, 1986.
*5. Respondent was notified
of the probable cause determination on March 27, 1986.
*6. Conciliation was unsuccessfully
attempted and, by letter dated April 9, 1986, Respondent requested
bypassing further conciliation.
*7. The Acting Executive
Director of the Commission, Louis Martin, recommended bypassing
further conciliation on July 1, 1986; Gretchen Hamlett, a Commissioner
of the Commission, approved the Acting Director's recommendation
on June 26.
8. Except for approximately
11 years, Hall was a resident of Burlington all her life. She
was employed by AAA and had been for 6 years. Hall was married
and had three children, ages 16, 12 and 4.
9. In July of 1985, she
lived at 1816 Barrett Street in Burlington. When she moved in,
she paid $350.00 a month rent. That was raised to $370.00 in June
1985. Because of increasing rent, she was looking for a house
to buy or with option to buy.
10. Gerdner owned the house
at 1204 South 14th Street in Burlington. Prior to Gerdner buying
that house, it had been for sale and Hall had talked with a realtor
about it. She was interested in that particular location because
it was closer to her relatives and to the school she and two of
her children had attended.
11. In July 1985, Hall decided
to pursue rental instead of buying. She checked the ads and inquired
about different properties. She wanted the South Hill. She responded
to an ad in the Hawk Eye dated Tuesday, July 30, 1986, by calling
the given number. Mrs. Gerdner answered the call and asked her
to call back when her husband was home. She did so. Gerdner explained
that he had bought the house at an auction and the owner had left
town without signing the contract of sale and that he couldn't
rent it until the contract was signed. Hall requested to see the
property anyway and arrangements were made for 6:30 that same
evening. Hall, her husband and their two daughters kept the appointment.
The Hall family is Black. They viewed the house, expressed their
interest in renting it and exchanged phone numbers. Gerdner did
not ask the Halls about their income, references or their current
landlord. The Halls were the first persons to look at the property.
They, were told the rent would be $300.00. No deposit was taken
because Gerdner did not want to do anything until he received
the signed contract from the seller of the property. Hall left
believing that they were just waiting for the signed contract
and that then they could arrange to rent the house. She proceeded
to obtain boxes and started packing.
12. When Hall called Gerdner to see if the contract had received, she was told the property was already rented.
13. Effective May 1986, Hall's rent was raised to $385.00.
14. On August 9, 1985, Gerdner
rented the house to the Riffel family, husband, wife and three
children - all white.
15. The Riffels saw the
ad in the paper on August 4th. They called Gerdner and
set up an appointment to see the house on either the 5th or 6th.
They were also told at first that the rent would be $300.00, and
that he had not received the signed document necessary for his
renting the house. Gerdner did not request any information about
the family income of the Riffel's. He did ask him about
his employment and present landlord. The Riffels expressed their
interest, but had some things they had to check on. They requested
a call if and when the property was available and that they would
talk to him about it at that time. They did not assume the rental
was theirs, but hoped Gerdner would call them and give them an
opportunity to discuss it. Gerdner did, in fact, call the Riffels
and told them that the property was available and that they could
rent it if they were interested. That occurred on the 6th, 7th,
or 8th of August. They rented the house on Friday, August 9, paid
$325.00 deposit and $175.00 for the remainder of the month of
August. Rent was to be $315.00. The Riffels actually paid only
$175.00 for 23 days instead of $237.59.
16. On August 5, 1987, the
Auction Company sent the unsigned contracts to the seller in Florida
by overnight Federal Express. It is assumed the seller received
the contracts on August 6, 1987. There is no evidence as to when
the seller signed, returned or Gerdner received the signed contract.
They could conceivably have been received as early as August 7th.
Gerdner testified that the Auction Company called him on August
9th, the same day he rented the property to the Riffels.
17. Gerdner stated that
he looks for tenants who are interested in staying, taking care
of the place, and who pay their bills.
18. Gerdner chose the Riffels
based on the questions they asked when shown the property, their
willingness to do painting in the house, request to replace a
ceiling fixture and their expression of interest. Gerdner admitted
the Halls were also interested in the property, that they didn't
say one way or the other how long they'd stay. Gerdner didn't
remember whether or not he gave Halls his phone number or asked
that they call in a week.
19. Both Celeste and her husband were upset by the refusal of Gerdner to give them the opportunity of renting the house they wanted.